The LocalMotive Project

Building resilience in the Saugeen Region.

That’s Premier Bognor Bill to you...

For a while I thought I could resist weighing in on last week’s hoopla over Bill Murdoch’s desire to give Toronto the big rubber boot out of Ontario. After all it’s maple syrup season and time’s-a-wastin’, but after reading several Toronto based commentaries on the fracas, I simply couldn’t sit it out.


A part of me loves it when Bill drops one of these bombs, if for no other reason than to distract our attention from the hopelessly broken federal political situation, which is becoming dull and whiney more than anything. I mean really folks...do we have to keep hashing over which stuffed shirt can restore legitimacy to our federal government? But kicking Toronto out of Ontario; now that has entertainment value.


The various commentaries on the subject reveal an alarming amount of ignorance from all sides. For example, those who appreciate Bill’s reasoning claim that Toronto is a blood-sucking chest wound on the rest of the Ontario economy, subsidized by us poor rural folks, while the Toronto based commentators see those of us out here in “the sticks” as a bunch of unenlightened folk who feed off of the rich flesh of Toronto, but won’t just move there because we’re too ignorant to understand that Toronto is indeed the centre of the universe.


Now, granted that the fine published works on the subject in all of the newspapers and blogs, represent the most extreme opinions; after all it’s their job to sell more adverts around that controversial Bill-bomb, but the re-surfacing of the subject has revealed some interesting thought gaps that I’d like to point out. I must admit that I’m not likely nearly as anti-Toronto as Bill, in spite of the fact that I haven’t got a nice cushy job there. I do enjoy visiting on occasion,and then racing back ahead of all the weekenders who love to hate us and hate to love us. In fact, it usually feels more like a pillage than a visit as I often bring back copious numbers of bikes from the Toronto police auction. So there, I guess I do profit from Toronto in that sense.


But I digress. Back to the thought gaps.

A recent piece on the Torontoist.com claimed that Toronto separating from Ontario wasn’t such a bad idea, because Toronto could do fine on it’s own, thank you very much. It kind of left me wondering what they’ll eat, but I suppose those are just details.

And in regard to who’s bleeding who, has anyone crunched the numbers? I haven’t. How much benefit do we really derive from Toronto and vice versa? Does anyone really care? Not likely. Most of these types of issues are emotionally based and used to highlight the grievance of one party over the other; a job which I must say Bill is fulfilling with flying colours.


But here’s what I see as the crux of the issue. Coyotes aside, there is a growing recognition that our current political structure is becoming largely incapable of addressing the new economic realities that are upon us. Take energy for example. Whether fossil fuels (gasoline) or electricity, we are heading for some huge shocks. The $147/per barrel oil price of 2008 is a foretaste of what is to come. The only way forward in such a volatile environment is a much more localized way of organizing ourselves and our economic activities. This requires much more distributed systems of energy production and consumption. Food is another critical one. Eating isn’t optional, and our food security is increasingly compromised through bad trade deals, the unprofitability of agriculture, and increasing levels of imports.


Then there’s the perpetual need for more money and power at the municipal/regional level in order to address the specific needs of citizens, by those elected officials who are closest to the action.


So what does this have to do with the Toronto ruckus? Well, Bill is correct about the Toronto mentality. It is a mentality that only knows hyper-centralization as the way forward. After all, dealing with 3 million plus Toronto residents gives new meaning to “herding cats” or trying to keep the proverbial “frogs in the wheelbarrow”. The tools of choice for our current government are over-standardization, and a big controlling stick.


So here’s one for Bill to consider. Rather than Toronto becoming it’s own province, Grey and Bruce counties could become a province instead. Think of all the fun. We could have a big naming contest so that visitors wouldn’t think we’re named after a grey haired dude named Bruce, the provincial capital could be Bognor or maybe Pinkerton, and if Bill sticks around long enough he could be Premier. And since we’d have almost the same population as PEI, would could send 3 stuffed shirts to Ottawa instead of 1 1/2.


As crazy as it sounds, it’s an idea that has been proposed seriously before, most recently at the LocalMotiveProject.com. What do you say Bill?


But time’s a wastin’. Back to the sap.

Views: 1

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of The LocalMotive Project to add comments!

Join The LocalMotive Project

Comment by Donato Cianci on April 21, 2010 at 11:39
As an individual I know I can't survive without a community of at least somewhat like-minded people willing to live trade work together. In our small communities, we need a council and police forces to manage and facilitate arguments and information and legislation over the boundary issues between individuals and even within families. In today's world and tomorrow's too, small communities can't live without a larger umbrella community to manage and facilitate arguments and information and legislation over the boundaries of land, resources, communications, and so on between all the smaller communities. In Canada, we call those Provinces. And the same goes for Provinces, they need a Canada to deal with issues between them, and to facilitate their relations with the rest of the world. When the global economic system we have built starts to really collapse, something that is likely within my lifetime certainly, we will be glad of the teeth provided by the Canadian army, and the USA, to protect some of our habitat at least from the ravening hordes.

No one in Grey Bruce is completely self sufficient. Most probably import 80 to 90 % of what they consider necessary for a decent life. Our tax base is not nearly big enough to support us all in a civilised way, and we certainly can't do without the taxes and other expenditures of the people of Greater Toronto. Even Canada depends on Toronto for that. Of course the megalopolis is doomed, but no one in recorded and surmised history has so far found a solution to the pattern of humanity since the invention of writing and agriculture, which is to congregate in ever larger aggregations, destroy the habitat by taking out more than they put in ( humans are addicted to the Ponzi scheme mentality that they can get more out of anything than they put in. Even in religion, we believe a few words of penitence for our sins will buy us eternal life) and solving the problem by a combination of dying off and moving on. And now, we cannot move on, nowhere empty left to emigrate to.

I think Murdoch is right to question our dependence on Toronto. Toronto doesn’t work for the long haul. But how we get to a workable substitute safely is an open question. We can build a gated community and try to live within it. But we will be overwhelmed by the fear an emotion of those outside, if they’ve lost everything and want what we seem to have. My grandfather’s ancestors and present relatives have lived in a tiny village on the top of a mountain in Basilicata in south Italy for over 2000 years certainly, “since always” to quote my Nonno Antonio. They have never had anything anyone else wanted, and their place is hard to live in, and easy to defend. So they have been left alone to live poor, but safe except for quarrels with neighbours. We are not so lucky. Donato

© 2012   Created by Shane Jolley.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service